One of the arguments that complementarians employ against women in ministry is the argument that God only used women as prophets and leaders in the Bible when there were no men available at the time. Is this really a valid argument? Let\u2019s have a look at two biblical examples.<\/p>\n
Elijah thought that he alone was left as a prophet of God because he alone was serving God yet God corrected him by saying that he had seven thousand others who have not bowed the knee to Baal.<\/p>\n
Romans 11:3 \u201cLord, THEY HAVE KILLED YOUR PROPHETS, THEY HAVE TORN DOWN YOUR ALTARS, AND I ALONE AM LEFT, AND THEY ARE SEEKING MY LIFE.\u201d
\nRomans 11:4 But what is the divine response to him? \u201cI HAVE KEPT for Myself SEVEN THOUSAND MEN WHO HAVE NOT BOWED THE KNEE TO BAAL.\u201d<\/p>\n
God has always had a remnant who followed him and thus God has never been without a man to serve him.<\/p>\n
Let\u2019s look at another example. Huldah was used by the Lord to bring a message to King Josiah yet God also had men available to be used. The prophet Jeremiah had been prophesying in Judah since the 13th year of the reign of King Josiah (see Jeremiah 1:2) and it was the 18th year of the reign of King Josiah (see 2 Kings 22:3) when Huldah was consulted as a Prophet of God to bring a message to King Josiah. So a woman, Huldah, was used by God even though Jeremiah was available and Jeremiah had already been prophesying in the land for five years. Even though Jeremiah was available, God used Huldah to speak his words to the king.<\/p>\n
2 Kings 22:12 Then the king commanded Hilkiah the priest, Ahikam the son of Shaphan, Achbor the son of Micaiah, Shaphan the scribe, and Asaiah the king\u2019s servant saying,
\n2 Kings 22:13 \u201cGo, inquire of the LORD for me and the people and all Judah concerning the words of this book that has been found, for great is the wrath of the LORD that burns against us, because our fathers have not listened to the words of this book, to do according to all that is written concerning us.\u201d
\n2 Kings 22:14 So Hilkiah the priest, Ahikam, Achbor, Shaphan, and Asaiah went to Huldah the prophetess, the wife of Shallum the son of Tikvah, the son of Harhas, keeper of the wardrobe (now she lived in Jerusalem in the Second Quarter); and they spoke to her.
\n2 Kings 22:15 She said to them, \u201cThus says the LORD God of Israel, \u2018Tell the man who sent you to me,
\n2 Kings 22:16 thus says the LORD, \u2026<\/p>\n
The fact is that God uses women for his own purposes and it is not biblically correct to say that God only uses women when God has no man available. Let\u2019s once and for all lay this false argument to rest. God uses women because it pleases him to use women and God still uses women today for his own glory and honor.<\/p>\n<\/body>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
One of the arguments that complementarians employ against women in ministry is the argument that God only used women as prophets and leaders in the Bible when there were no men available at the time. Is this really a valid argument? Let\u2019s have a look at two biblical examples. Elijah thought that he alone was left as a prophet of God because he alone was serving God yet God corrected him by saying that he had seven thousand others who…<\/p>\n