<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there a law that forbids women from teaching men?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strivetoenter.com/wim/2006/07/02/is-there-a-law-that-forbids-women-from-teaching-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strivetoenter.com/wim/2006/07/02/is-there-a-law-that-forbids-women-from-teaching-men/</link>
	<description>This blog is for dialogue on the issue of women in ministry and the freedom for women to teach the bible in a public setting.  It is also for questions and answers on our DVD entitled "Women in Ministry: Silenced or Set Free?"  This 4 DVD set answers the hard passages of scripture that seem to restrict women's ministry.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Polls&#8230; &#171; Grace Rules Weblog</title>
		<link>http://strivetoenter.com/wim/2006/07/02/is-there-a-law-that-forbids-women-from-teaching-men/comment-page-1/#comment-4742</link>
		<dc:creator>A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Polls&#8230; &#171; Grace Rules Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strivetoenter.com/wim/?p=15#comment-4742</guid>
		<description>[...] this universal and transcultural then we have to make all the commands of I Timothy transcultural. Cheryl Schatz also has an excellent post on this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this universal and transcultural then we have to make all the commands of I Timothy transcultural. Cheryl Schatz also has an excellent post on this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Women In Ministry &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Does God have one unique law? Part Two</title>
		<link>http://strivetoenter.com/wim/2006/07/02/is-there-a-law-that-forbids-women-from-teaching-men/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Women In Ministry &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Does God have one unique law? Part Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strivetoenter.com/wim/?p=15#comment-86</guid>
		<description>[...] Complementarians have stated that God has a law that forbids godly Christian women from teaching correct biblical doctrine to men. This law, they say, is revealed in 1 Timothy 2:12. Since we saw in part one that this law is foreign to the Old Testament, letâ€™s have a look at the New Testament to see if there is a second witness to this law. Paul stated that repetition is for our safety. Philippians 3:1 says: Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things again is no trouble to me, and it is a safeguard for you. Paul knew the importance of repetition. Every time doctrine is repeated and every time a prohibition is restated, we have a verification of the facts. Cults often take one scripture out of context and twist the meaning. When a fact is repeated, it is less likely that the fact can be disregarded or disputed. Repetition is indeed necessary for our safety. So since we know that the â€œlawâ€ that forbids godly women from teaching correct biblical doctrine to men is not stated in the Old Testament and would not have been a tutor for the women in the early church, is there a repetition of this â€œlawâ€ in the New Testament anywhere? No there is not. Now isnâ€™t that odd? Every single â€œlawâ€ in the bible is verified by a second witness, except for this one. For more discussion on the necessity of having a second witness click here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Complementarians have stated that God has a law that forbids godly Christian women from teaching correct biblical doctrine to men. This law, they say, is revealed in 1 Timothy 2:12. Since we saw in part one that this law is foreign to the Old Testament, letâ€™s have a look at the New Testament to see if there is a second witness to this law. Paul stated that repetition is for our safety. Philippians 3:1 says: Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things again is no trouble to me, and it is a safeguard for you. Paul knew the importance of repetition. Every time doctrine is repeated and every time a prohibition is restated, we have a verification of the facts. Cults often take one scripture out of context and twist the meaning. When a fact is repeated, it is less likely that the fact can be disregarded or disputed. Repetition is indeed necessary for our safety. So since we know that the â€œlawâ€ that forbids godly women from teaching correct biblical doctrine to men is not stated in the Old Testament and would not have been a tutor for the women in the early church, is there a repetition of this â€œlawâ€ in the New Testament anywhere? No there is not. Now isnâ€™t that odd? Every single â€œlawâ€ in the bible is verified by a second witness, except for this one. For more discussion on the necessity of having a second witness click here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
